OVERVIEW


        Central Idaho

        Economic Development &

           Recreation Act


> Weakening protections for the nation’s public lands and waters

> Damaging the Sawtooth National Recreation Area


Warm Springs Creek with Castle Peak in background - Sawtooth National Recreation Area.  CIEDRA would change the purpose, and management for the eastern half of the Sawtooth NRA.


Congress established the 756,000-acre Sawtooth NRA with solid conservation purposes:


In order to assure the preservation and protection of the natural, scenic, historic, pastoral, and fish and wildlife values and to provide for the enhancement of the recreational values associated therewith, the Sawtooth National Recreation Area is hereby established.  [16 U.S.C.A. § 460aa]


CIEDRA changes the purpose of the 370,000 acres in the eastern half of the Sawtooth NRA.  Part of those lands would be formally designated as wilderness (albeit with weakened protections).  However, the rest of that portion of the Sawtooth NRA, packaged with additional Forest Service and BLM lands (totaling some 550,000 acres), would become the “Boulder White Clouds Management Area would Congressionally define the purpose as providing for motorized recreation:


[i]t is the purpose of this title to provide that motorized use of such lands shall be allowed in accordance with travel maps for the federal lands within the perimeter as shown on the maps entitled -  ‘‘CIEDRA: USFS and BLM Travel Plan’’ and ‘‘CIEDRA:     USFS and BLM Winter Travel Plan’’ and dated November 15, 2006.

  (CIEDRA Section 301)


When future conflicts arise between motorized recreation and the Sawtooth NRA’s conservation purposes, motorized recreation will prevail.


Confluence of Valley Creek and Salmon River between Stanley and Lower Stanley.  CIEDRA would give away public lands shown in foreground for development.


CIEDRA would give away 162 acres of public lands in the Sawtooth NRA that include elk wintering grounds and salmon waters near Stanley, Idaho.  Altogether, it would give away over 5,000 acres of federal land to local government and developers for free.


Taxpayers have already spent $65 million to create and protect the SNRA, an icon among America’s western landscapes.   CIEDRA sets a precedent of dismantling protections on public land.

Salmon spawning, Sawtooth NRA.


In 2000, the Idaho Supreme Court stripped the Sawtooth NRA of its protections for water.  What this means is that Idaho is free to continuing to issue new water rights, and Idaho will continue to do so.


CIEDRA should protect water and reassert in-stream flow protections.  Instead, the bill expressly denies a federal water right for the wilderness areas, and is completely silent as to the new Boulder White Clouds Management Area where water development will likely occur.  

(John Osborn photo)

 

(John Osborn photo)

 
Overview


This series of websites is intended to provide an overview of the Central Idaho Economic Development and Recreation Act (CIEDRA).  This webpage provides an overview.  For more indepth analysis, click here.  A “side-by-side” display of the the most recent bill compared with bill that passed the U.S. House on a suspension of rules can be viewed by clicking here.

CIEDRA would create 312,000 acres of substandard wilderness and designate over 500,000 acres of immediately adjacent land in which motorized access would be given special priority over other uses.  CIEDRA would subvert the conservation purposes of the Sawtooth National Recreation Area’s eastern half.

This bill is touted as a wilderness bill but it is not supportive of wilderness values.  Unlike traditional wilderness legislation, wilderness provisions are now folded into a multi-purpose bill that facilitates water and land development, and bolsters local control over assets that belong to all Americans. 

In this quid pro quo deal, CIEDRA would give over 5,000 acres of our public land to local counties and local municipalities.  County Commissions would sell some of these public lands for property tax income - a dangerous slippery slope for America’s public land heritage.	

CIEDRA establishes a 'no net loss' policy for motorized trails--if a trail is closed due to environmental damage or any other reason, equivalent new mileage must be opened up elsewhere.  Motorized vehicles harass wildlife, create erosion, introduce invasive noxious weeds, and take away the solitude of hunters, hikers, and horseback riders who seek to enjoy the natural quiet and to view wildlife. The decision whether to open or close an area should be in the hands of professional land managers on the ground, not mandated under federal legislation. 

Normally federal designations such as the Sawtooth NRA include federal protection of instream flows.  However, in 2000 the Idaho Supreme Court stripped the Sawtooth NRA of its protections for water.  CIEDRA should restore those protections.  Instead, the bill expressly denies a federal water right and does nothing to restore water rights to Sawtooth NRA lands not designated in the bill - leaving streams vulnerable.  The Salmon River and its tributaries could be degraded as a result, further harming salmon recovery. 
 
Sierra Club’s Sawtooth Group and 47 other conservation and sportsman's organizations (15 of which are in Idaho) oppose this bill. 	
Idaho is truly one of the last great places where we have healthy ecosystems with clean water, clean air, and thriving native wildlife populations.  The sacrifices in this bill are just too great to allow this bill to go forward. 
	
	 
http://waterplanet.ws/ciedra_analysis/overview/home.htmlside-by-side.htmlshapeimage_3_link_0shapeimage_3_link_1

(Gary Gadwa photo)

 

Mountain Goats and Trail Damage from Motorized Recreation Use - Sawtooth National Recreation Area


CIEDRA would dismantle the conservation purposes of the Sawtooth NRA by establishing a 'no net loss' policy for motorized trails -- if a trail is closed due to environmental damage or any other reason, equivalent new mileage must be opened up elsewhere.  Motorized vehicles harass wildlife, create erosion, introduce invasive noxious weeds, and take away the solitude of hunters, hikers, and horseback riders who seek to enjoy the natural quiet and to view wildlife. The decision whether to open or close an area should be in the hands of professional land managers on the ground, not mandated under federal legislation.


(Gary Gadwa photo)

 

(John Osborn photo)

 

Contents
  CIEDRA Overview
  CIEDRA Analysis

  CIEDRA Side-by-side Comparison

  Title I -- Side-by-side comparison
      Public Land Giveaways
      Outfitter and Guides

 Title II -- Side-by-side comparison
       Roadless Areas Not Designated Wilderness
       Water Rights
       Mining
       Wildlife

  Title III -- Side-by-side comparison
       ORV use - prohibiting trail closure




http://waterplanet.ws/ciedra_analysis/overview/home.htmlsidebyside.html../title1/ciedratitle1.html../title1/landgiveaway.html../title1/outfittersandguides.html../title2/ciedratitle2.html../title2/releasedroadlessareas.html../title2/waterrights.html../title2/mining.html../title2/wildlife.html../title3/ciedratitle3.html../title3/closingtrails.htmlshapeimage_4_link_0shapeimage_4_link_1shapeimage_4_link_2shapeimage_4_link_3shapeimage_4_link_4shapeimage_4_link_5shapeimage_4_link_6shapeimage_4_link_7shapeimage_4_link_8shapeimage_4_link_9shapeimage_4_link_10shapeimage_4_link_11shapeimage_4_link_12


   Support Wilderness - Oppose CIEDRA.   We can do better.